Archive

May 29, 2012

Couch v. SMC Lending, Inc.

Since 1979, lenders have been allowed to charge exceptionally high interest rates on residential second mortgage loans secured by Missouri real estate (sometimes called “home equity loans”).  In fact, since 1998, the Missouri Second Mortgage Loan Act has allowed unlimited interest rates on those loans.  However, in exchange for allowing lenders to charge what would otherwise be […] Read More




May 29, 2012

Gilmor v. Preferred Credit Corporation

Since 1979, lenders have been allowed to charge exceptionally high interest rates on residential second mortgage loans secured by Missouri real estate (sometimes called “home equity loans”).  In fact, since 1998, the Missouri Second Mortgage Loan Act has allowed unlimited interest rates on those loans.  However, in exchange for allowing lenders to charge what would otherwise be […] Read More




May 29, 2012

Wong v. Bann-Cor Mortgage

Since 1979, lenders have been allowed to charge exceptionally high interest rates on residential second mortgage loans secured by Missouri real estate (sometimes called “home equity loans”).  In fact, since 1998, the Missouri Second Mortgage Loan Act has allowed unlimited interest rates on those loans.  However, in exchange for allowing lenders to charge what would otherwise be […] Read More




May 29, 2012

Beaver v. First Consumers Mortgage, Inc.

Since 1979, lenders have been allowed to charge exceptionally high interest rates on residential second mortgage loans secured by Missouri real estate (sometimes called “home equity loans”).  In fact, since 1998, the Missouri Second Mortgage Loan Act has allowed unlimited interest rates on those loans.  However, in exchange for allowing lenders to charge what would otherwise be […] Read More




April 11, 2012

Gilmor Preferred Credit Trusts Settlement

WRRSV is please to announce a $3,500,000 class action settlement in Gilmor, et al. v. Preferred Credit Corporation, et al., Case No.  4:10-cv-00189-ODS. The Preferred Trusts and Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage have agreed to pay $3,500,000 to settle the claims of 91 class members who obtained 51 loans that were assigned and sold to the Preferred […] Read More




March 14, 2012

Mayo v. Residential Funding Company and GMAC Mortgage Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce that they have settled the claims of 94 putative class members against only Defendants, Residential Funding Company (“RFC”) and/or GMAC Mortgage (“GMAC”), with respect to 70 of the loans at issue in Mayo v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al., Case No. 4:08-CV-00568-W-DGK. The class action settlement resolves the claims of 94 […] Read More




March 14, 2012

Thomas v. Residential Funding Company Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce that they have settled the claims of 71 putative class members against only Defendant Residential Funding Company (“RFC”) with respect to 40 of the loans at issue in Thomas v. U.S. Bank, N.A., N.D., et al., Case No. 11-6013-CV-SJ-SOW. The class action settlement resolves the claims of 71 class members against […] Read More




November 29, 2011

Landrum vs. Meadows Credit Union Settlement

Walters, Renwick Richards Skeens & Vaughan, P.C. is pleased to announce the settlement of a class action lawsuit, Landrum v. Meadows Credit Union, Case No. 08-441-CV-W-DW, pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.   The Class Members asserted claims for violations of Missouri Uniform Commercial Code and Merchandising Practices Act […] Read More




November 14, 2011

Shokere vs. RFC Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce a $2,460,845 class action settlement in Shokere vs. Residential Funding Company., et al., Case No.  1116-CV30478. Residential Funding Company has agreed to pay $2,460,845  to settle the claims of 166 class members who obtained 110 second mortgage loans that were purchased by, assigned to, serviced by or master serviced by Residential Funding […] Read More




August 10, 2011

Baker v. CFG Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce a $1,075,700.42 class action settlement in Baker, et al. v. Century Financial Group, Inc., et al., Case No. CV100-4294 CC. Residential Funding Corporation has agreed to pay $1,075,700.42 to settle the claims of 46 class members who obtained 28 second mortgage loans from Century Financial Group on or after June 28, 1994. Century […] Read More




August 2, 2011

Couch v. SMC Lending Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce a $4,255,437.84 class action settlement in Couch, et al. v. SMC Lending, et al., Case No. CV100-4332 CC. Residential Funding Corporation has agreed to pay $4,255,437  to settle the claims of 147 class members who obtained 88 second mortgage loans from SMC Lending on or after June 29, 1994. SMC Lending […] Read More




February 3, 2011

Hopkins vs. Kansas Teachers Community Credit Union Settlement

February 3, 2011, Kansas City, Missouri: Walters, Renwick Richards Skeens & Vaughan, P.C. announce the settlement of a class action lawsuit, Hopkins v. Kansas Teachers Community Credit Union, Case No. 08-5052-CV-SW-GAF, pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.   The Class Members asserted claims for violations of Missouri’s Uniform […] Read More




August 25, 2009

Schwartz Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce a $4 million class action settlement in Schwartz , et al. v. Wachovia Equity Servicing, LLC, et al., Case No. 00 CV226639 (Mo. Cir.)Wachovia Equity Servicing, LLC and The Money Store, LLC have agreed to pay $4 million to settle the claims of 81 class members who obtained 52 second […] Read More




April 17, 2009

McLean Settlement

WRRSV is pleased to announce a $36.3 million class action settlement in McLean, et al. v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation (f/k/a McGuire Mortgage Company) Case No. 00 CV 228530 (Cir. Ct. Mo.).   First Horizon Home Loan Corp. has agreed to pay up to $36.3 million to settle the claims of over 4,000 class […] Read More




This is an advertisement.

Disclaimer: All material on this website is strictly informational and does not constitute legal advice or create attorney/client privilege. If you desire to become a client, please contact our office directly through e-mail, telephone or fax.

 

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

×